Player

ElectionsRediscovering American HistoryRole of GovernmentWeekly/September 25, 2020

TPS60: Election 2020 — The Court and the Social Dilemma

Download Episode //

TPS60: Election 2020 — The Court and the Social Dilemma

Why is the U.S Supreme Court so important? Should it really be that important? Tune in this week as we talk about the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. What does this mean for the Election? Tune in today plus don’t miss a brief but important conversation on a film lots of people are talking about, The Social Dilemma. You don’t want to miss this.

Resources:
Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton (see below for excerpt)
The Social Dilemma, Netflix
iVoters.com

Release Date: Friday, September 25, 2020

Direct Download of This Episode Available Here

Excerpt from the Federalist No. 78 by Alexander Hamilton:

The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of the courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing.

There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.

Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the Constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental.

It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the constitutional intentions of the legislature. This might as well happen in the case of two contradictory statutes; or it might as well happen in every adjudication upon any single statute. The courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body. The observation, if it prove any thing, would prove that there ought to be no judges distinct from that body.

But it is not with a view to infractions of the Constitution only that the independence of the judges may be an essential safeguard against the effects of occasional ill humors in the society. These sometimes extend no farther than to the injury of the private rights of particular classes of citizens, by unjust and partial laws. Here also the firmness of the judicial magistracy is of vast importance in mitigating the severity and confining the operation of such laws. It not only serves to moderate the immediate mischiefs of those which may have been passed but it operates as a check upon the legislative body in passing them; who, perceiving that obstacles to the success of an iniquitous intention are to be expected from the scruples of the courts, are in a manner compelled, by the very motives of the injustice they meditate, to qualify their attempts. This is a circumstance calculated to have more influence upon the character of our governments than but few may be aware of. The benefits of the integrity and moderation of the judiciary have already been felt in more states than one; and though they may have displeased those whose sinister expectations they may have disappointed, they must have commanded the esteem and applause of all the virtuous and disinterested. Considerate men of every description ought to prize whatever will tend to beget or fortify that temper in the courts; as no man can be sure that he may not be tomorrow the victim of a spirit of injustice, by which he may be a gainer today. And every man must now feel that the inevitable tendency of such a spirit is to sap the foundations of public and private confidence and to introduce in its stead universal distrust and distress.

Recent Episodes

TPS 60: Gilbert & Jack

April 9, 2021

Today we are excited and honored to share “Gilbert & Jack: What C.S. Lewis Found Reading G.K. Chesterton” by Alan C. Duncan. We are so proud of our producer and faithful staff member, Alan C. Duncan. We were able to

Read more ›

TPS 2: Excelsior Pass, Part V

April 9, 2021

Can the Excelsior Pass end our Civil Liberties? Why do we need this pass when we are so close to herd immunity? Join us now on The Public Square®. Topic: Life and Health Issues The Public Square® with host Dave

Read more ›

TPS 2: Excelsior Pass, Part IV

April 8, 2021

Who decided on the Excelsior Pass? Is it Constitutional? Will there be a vote? We address all these questions and more on The Public Square®. Topic: Life and Health Issues The Public Square® with host Dave Zanotti thepublicsquare.com Air Date:

Read more ›

TPS Express: A President, a Fighter, and an American

April 7, 2021

Today we take a moment to talk about Theodore Roosevelt. Our team examines his fascinating beginnings, presidency, civil rights efforts, and much more. We so enjoyed revisiting this episode from our archives and we hope you do as well. Listen

Read more ›

TPS 2: Excelsior Pass, Part III

April 7, 2021

We believe the New York, Excelsior Pass is a terrible idea. Will this become a national mistake? Tune in now on The Public Square®. Topic: Life and Health Issues The Public Square® with host Dave Zanotti thepublicsquare.com Air Date: Wednesday,

Read more ›

TPS 2: Excelsior Pass, Part II

April 6, 2021

Is the Excelsior Vaccine Pass voluntary? How does this app work? Let’s find out now on The Public Square®. Topic: Life and Health Issues The Public Square® with host Dave Zanotti thepublicsquare.com Air Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2021   Direct

Read more ›

TPS 2: Excelsior Pass, Part I

April 5, 2021

This week we discuss the Excelsior Vaccine Pass being developed in New York City. This is a critical issue. So tune in now on The Public Square®. Topic: Life and Health Issues The Public Square® with host Dave Zanotti thepublicsquare.com

Read more ›

TPS 60: Where is Our Hope?

April 2, 2021

From election takeovers to COVID Vaccine Passports the news is filled with stories that are alarming. Where is our hope? Is it in political forces or personalities? Or is there a greater hope that can see us through these troubling times?

Read more ›